Wow, times have changed.

In my opinion, the most interesting aspect of the Halperin articles was the use of power in “sexuality” that was observed in ancient Athens. The use of dominance in the act of sex conveyed a very non-romantic, non-loving atmosphere of Athens, where reproduction was the only positive sexual outcome. The social structure was so competitive and judgmental as far as social status that the intense act of sex was looked as primarily a way to show social ranking. Only the higher status member could gain pleasure from the act, which was oblivious of gender specifications. This is fascinating when compared to the modern view of sex and “sexuality” because in present times, the act of sex is solely about pleasure and romance, as well as carrying highly biased and opinionated views on hetero or homosexual actions. The social judgmental view has changed from status to gender preference. It is seen as “normal” in today’s world for women to be dominate over men in many areas of life, and our Western culture actually celebrates this feminine power. The Halperin article opened my eyes to the vast difference in cultural and social beliefs of ancient societies in comparison to present societies.
I am curious as to when the focus of society “sexuality” changed from social status to gender preference. It seems that throughout history, that act of sex has occurred between the same and different genders, whether society acknowledged that fact or not. This supports the belief that a person’s sexual preference is based on unchangeable nature instead of cultural surroundings. So, I am curious as to when the negative connotations on homosexuality arise when, in actuality, homosexuality or that act of sex between the same gender, has existed for much of history. Halperin states that “sexual desires are constructed, mass produced, and distributed among the various members of human living-groups.” (426). I couldn’t agree more.